4.6 Review

Animal models of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: what have we learned and where do we go? Insight for therapeutics

Journal

BASIC RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY
Volume 112, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00395-017-0640-3

Keywords

ARVC; Animal models; Exercise; Therapies; Desmosomes

Funding

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) [PI14/0967, RD012/0042/0066]
  2. Todos somos Raros program
  3. Spanish Society of Cardiology
  4. Plan Estatal de I + D+I - European Regional Development Fund (FEDER)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a rare genetically-determined cardiac heart muscle disorder characterized by fibro-fatty replacement of the myocardium that results in heart failure and sudden cardiac death (SCD), predominantly in young males. The disease is often caused by mutations in genes encoding proteins of the desmosomal complex, with a significant minority caused by mutations in non-desmosomal proteins. Existing treatment options are based on SCD prevention with the implantable cardioverter defibrillator, antiarrhythmic drugs, and anti-heart failure medication. Heart transplantation may also be required and there is currently no cure. Several genetically modified animal models have been developed to characterize the disease, assess its progression, and determine the influence of potential environmental factors. These models have also been very valuable for translational therapeutic approaches, to screen new treatment options that prevent and/or reverse the disease. Here, we review the available ARVC animal models reported to date, highlighting the most important pathophysiological findings and discussing the effect of treatments tested so far in this setting. We also describe gaps in our knowledge of the disease, with the goal of stimulating research and improving patient outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available