4.7 Article

Quantitative risk assessment of slope failure in 2-D spatially variable soils by limit equilibrium method

Journal

APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
Volume 47, Issue -, Pages 710-725

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2017.03.048

Keywords

Slope stability; System reliability; Risk assessment; Probability of failure; Spatial variability

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51509125, 51679117]
  2. Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering [Z016014]
  3. Open Research Fund of Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering (Ministry of Education) [RMHSE1505]
  4. Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation [20161BAB216117]
  5. Sino-German (CSC-DAAD) Postdoc Scholarship Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantitative risk assessment of slope failure is an important prerequisite for formulating rational strategies for landslide risk mitigation and developing a landslide risk-based warning system. Efficient risk assessment of slope failure in two-dimensional (2-D) spatially variable soils is a challenging problem. This paper proposes an efficient approach for quantitative risk assessment of slope failure considering the 2-D spatial variation of soil properties in the limit equilibrium analysis framework. To facilitate the risk assessment of slope failure, an empirical method is developed for the identification of slope key failure modes. With the proposed approach, the key failure modes of the spatially variable slope can be well identified and their contributions to the risk of slope failure can be effectively quantified. Finally, a two-layered soil slope is studied to illustrate the proposed approach. It is found that the prominent advantages of the proposed approach include being computationally efficient and accounting for the effect of the correlations among the failure modes. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available