4.7 Article

Call, put and bidirectional option contracts in agricultural supply chains with sales effort

Journal

APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
Volume 47, Issue -, Pages 1-16

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2017.03.002

Keywords

Agricultural supply chain; Option contracts; Sales effort; Coordination

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71572058, 71101054, 71571100, 71201083]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, SCUT [2015ZZ057]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [NS2015076]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper develops option contracts in a supplier-retailer agricultural supply chain where the market demand depends on sales effort. First, we examine a benchmark case of integrated supply chain with the loss rate. Second, we introduce three coordinating option contracts led by the supplier to reduce the retailer's risk, where the call option contract can reduce the shortage risk, the put option contract can reduce the inventory risk and the bidirectional option contract can reduce the bilateral risk. We find that both the optimal initial order quantity and the optimal option quantity increase with the sales effort and the option price will balance the influence of the loss rate on supply chain coordination. Furthermore, the bidirectional option price is the highest while its option quantity is the least, and the put option initial order quantity is the highest. Third, we also consider an option contract led by the retailer to reduce the supplier's wholesale risk. Among the above four option contracts, we find that the option quantity led by the retailer is the highest. Finally, the numerical examples present the impact of the parameters on the optimal decisions, and provide practical managerial insights to reduce the different risk in the agricultural supply chain. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available