4.2 Article

Volatility of network indices due to undersampling of intraspecific variation in plant-insect interactions

Journal

ARTHROPOD-PLANT INTERACTIONS
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 561-566

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11829-016-9493-1

Keywords

Community ecology; Plant-pollinator network; Robustness; Specialization

Funding

  1. Paris Lodron University of Salzburg
  2. Graduate School Evolutionary Networks: Organisms, Reactions, Molecules (E-Norm) of the Heinrich-Heine-University, Dusseldorf, Germany
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG JU 2856/2-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Appropriate sampling effort of interaction networks is necessary to extract robust indices describing the structure of species interactions. Here we show that time-invariant variation in the composition and diversity of interaction partners of plant individuals of the same species explains volatility in aggregate network statistics due to undersampling. Within a multi-species pollinator-plant interaction matrix, we replaced the interactions observed on multiple individuals of a single plant species (Sinapis arvensis, pooled interactions) with the plant-insect interactions observed on a single plant individual. In the resampling approach, we considered the interactions of 1 to 84 S. arvensis individuals in different combinations. For each resampled network, several commonly applied aggregated statistics were calculated to test how intraspecific variation affects the properties of a multi-species network. Our results showed that aggregate statistics are sensitive towards qualitative and quantitative intraspecific variation of flower-visitor interactions within a multi-species network, which may affect the ecological interpretation about the properties of a community. These findings challenge the robustness of commonly applied network indices, confirm the urge for a sufficient and representative sampling of interactions, and emphasize the significance of intraspecific variation in the context of communities and networks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available