4.0 Article

Comparison of methods for obtaining doubled haploids of carrot

Journal

ACTA SOCIETATIS BOTANICORUM POLONIAE
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

POLSKIE TOWARZYSTWO BOTANICZNE
DOI: 10.5586/asbp.3547

Keywords

androgenesis; anther culture; Daucus carota; haploids; isoenzymes; isolated microspores

Categories

Funding

  1. project New technology for deriving starting materials for breeding F1 hybrids of carrot [UDA-POIG.01.03.01-10-114/08-07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Doubled haploid lines of carrot can be obtained through androgenesis in anther cultures and in isolated microspore cultures. The two methods were compared using three carrot cultivars ('Kazan F1', 'Feria F1', and 'Narbonne F1') at the androgenesis induction stage, during plant regeneration from embryos, and during acclimatization of androgenetic plants as well as their characterization. It was found that cultivar was the main factor affecting the efficiency at each stage of plant production in both anther and isolated microspore cultures. The efficiency of androgenesis in anther cultures of 'Feria F1' was considerably higher in comparison with isolated microspore cultures, and more plants were obtained from the embryos of androgenesis-cultured plants. In 'Kazan F1' and 'Narbonne F1', more acclimatized androgenetic plants were produced from anther cultures. Ploidy assessment of acclimatized plants of 'Narbonne F1' showed that the majority of the plants in the population derived from anther cultures had a doubled chromosome (DH) set. On the other hand, the majority of plants obtained from isolated microspore cultures were haploids. When assessing homozygosity, it was found among plants obtained in anther cultures that the percentage of homozygotes for phosphoglucose isomerase (PGI) and aspartate aminotransferase (AAT) depended on the cultivar. In contrast, the majority of plants derived from isolated microspore cultures were homozygous regardless of cultivar.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available