4.7 Article

Glycomic and glycoproteomic analysis of glycoproteins-a tutorial

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 409, Issue 19, Pages 4483-4505

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-017-0406-7

Keywords

Glycomics; Glycoproteomics; Mass spectrometry; Glycan analysis; Glycopeptide; Glycosylation site mapping

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [1S10OD018530, P41GM10349010, R121GM122633]
  2. Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy grant at the Complex Carbohydrate Research Center [DE-SC0015662]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The structural analysis of glycoproteins is a challenging endeavor and is under steadily increasing demand, but only a very limited number of labs have the expertise required to accomplish this task. This tutorial is aimed at researchers from the fields of molecular biology and biochemistry that have discovered that glycoproteins are important in their biological research and are looking for the tools to elucidate their structure. It provides brief descriptions of the major and most common analytical techniques used in glycomics and glycoproteomics analysis, including explanations of the rationales for individual steps and references to published literature containing the experimental details necessary to carry out the analyses. Glycomics includes the comprehensive study of the structure and function of the glycans expressed in a given cell or organism along with identification of all the genes that encode glycoproteins and glycosyltransferases. Glycoproteomics which is subset of both glycomics and proteomics is the identification and characterization of proteins bearing carbohydrates as posttranslational modification. This tutorial is designed to ease entry into the glycomics and glycoproteomics field for those without prior carbohydrate analysis experience.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available