4.4 Article

Diabetes as a risk factor for acute coronary syndrome in women compared with men: a meta-analysis, including 10 856 279 individuals and 106 703 acute coronary syndrome events

Journal

DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.2887

Keywords

acute coronary syndrome; diabetes; gender; meta-analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Diabetes mellitus is a significant cause of death and disability worldwide and is a strong risk factor for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Whether diabetes confers the same excess risk of ACS in both sexes is unknown. Therefore, we undertook a meta-analysis to estimate the relative risk (RR) for ACS associated with diabetes in men and women. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for both case-control and cohort studies published between January 1, 1966, and January 1, 2015. Studies were included if they reported sex-specific estimates of the RR, hazard ratio, or odds ratio for the association between diabetes and ACS. We pooled the sex-specific RR and the ratio between women and men using a random-effect model with inverse-variance weighting. Results We included 9 case-control and 10 cohort studies with data for 10 856 279 individuals and at least 106 703 fatal and nonfatal ACS events. The pooled maximum-adjusted RR of ACS associated with diabetes was 2.46 (95% CI, 1.92-3.17) in women and 1.68 (95% CI, 1.39-2.04) in men. In patients with diabetes compared with those without diabetes, women had a significantly greater risk of ACS-the pooled women-to-men RR and the ratio of relative risks was 1.38 (95% CI, 1.25-1.52; P < .001), with no evidence of publication bias. Conclusions The excess risk of ACS associated with diabetes is significantly higher in women than in men. This finding may be explained by more adverse cardiovascular risk profiles and suggests that further work is needed to clarify the relevant biological, behavioural, and social mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available