4.5 Article

Persistent nasal carriers of Acinetobacter baumannii in long-term-care facilities

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL
Volume 45, Issue 7, Pages 723-727

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.02.005

Keywords

Staphylococcus aureus; Carrier state; Community hospitals

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST-104-2627-M-009-006]
  2. Changhua Christian Hospital [105-CCH-IPR-001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Acinetobacter baumannii and Staphylococcus aureus have persisted as 2 major pathogens worldwide. Aim: We designed a prevalence study to investigate the prevalence of nasal carriage of S aureus and A baumannii in long-term-care facilities (LCTFs) and their collaborative community hospitals. In addition, we aimed to clarify persistent or nonpersistent carriage of the 2 organisms among residents of LTCFs. Methods: We performed a prevalence study concerning nasal carriers of A baumannii and S aureus in 3 LTCFs and 1 collaborative community hospital. Results: Seventy subjects were enrolled and clustered into 3 groups: the elderly sick group (n = 24), the elderly healthy group (n = 33), and the healthy health care worker group (n = 13). Nasal samples were collected, and the nuc and mecA genes of S aureus and the bla(OXA) gene of A baumannii were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction. Among the 3 groups, the rate of nasal carriage of S aureus was approximately 0%-15%. However, the rate for A baumannii was approximately 54%-92%. Notably, the persistent carrier rate of A baumannii in the elderly sick group was 83.3% (20 out of 24) despite a 12.5% (3 out of 24) rate of carbapenem-resistant A baumannii. Conclusions: We emphasized that the persistent nasal carriage of A baumannii in LTCFs could be another portal of exit to cause A baumannii infection in Taiwan. (C) 2017 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available