4.5 Article

Intravascular ultrasound guidance improves clinical outcomes during implantation of both first- and second generation drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis

Journal

EUROINTERVENTION
Volume 12, Issue 13, Pages 1632-1642

Publisher

EUROPA EDITION
DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00769

Keywords

coronary angioplasty; drug-eluting stent; intravascular ultrasound; meta-analysis; percutaneous coronary intervention

Funding

  1. Robertson Family Research Cardiologist Fellowship
  2. British Heart Foundation [FS/13/33/30168] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0616-10036] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: Our aim was to assess whether intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) improves clinical outcomes during implantation of first-and second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). IVUS guidance is associated with improved clinical outcomes during DES implantation, but it is unknown whether this benefit is limited to either first-or second-generation devices. Methods and results: MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed were searched for studies comparing outcomes between IVUS- and angiography-guided PCI. Among 909 potentially relevant studies, 15 trials met the inclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was MACE, defined as death, myocardial infarction, target vessel/lesion revascularisation (TVR/TLR) or stent thrombosis (ST). Summary estimates were obtained using Peto modelling. In total, 9,313 patients from six randomised trials and nine observational studies were included. First-generation DES were implanted in 6,156 patients (3,064 IVUS-guided and 3,092 angiography-guided) and second-generation in 3,157 patients (1,528 IVUS-guided and 1,629 angiography-guided). IVUS guidance was associated with a significant reduction in MACE (odds ratio [OR] 0.73, 95% CI: 0.64-0.85, p<0.001), across both first-(OR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.67-0.92, p=0.01) and second-generation DES (0.57, 95% CI: 0.43-0.77, p<0.001). For second-generation DES, IVUS guidance was associated with significantly lower rates of cardiac death (OR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.14-0.78, p=0.02), TVR (OR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.28-0.79, p=0.006), TLR (OR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.42-0.90, p=0.01) and ST (OR 0.31, 95% CI: 0.12-0.78, p=0.02). Cumulative meta-analysis highlighted progressive temporal benefit towards IVUS-guided PCI to reduce MACE (OR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.48-0.75, p<0.001). Conclusions: IVUS guidance is associated with a significant reduction in MACE during implantation of both first-and second-generation DES platforms. These data support the use of IVUS guidance in contemporary revascularisation procedures using second-generation DES.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available