4.4 Article

A conceptual model to integrate the regional context in landscape policy, management and contribution to rural development: Literature review and European case study evidence

Journal

GEOFORUM
Volume 82, Issue -, Pages 1-12

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.03.012

Keywords

Agricultural landscapes; Agri-environmental policy; Landscape services; Place; Geography; Regional assets; Governance; Rural development

Categories

Funding

  1. EU 7th and Horizon Framework Programme project CLAIM
  2. EU 7th and Horizon Framework Programme project PROVIDE - European Commission - DG Research Innovation [222738, 633838]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Agri-environmental policies and planning influence agricultural landscape management, and thus the capacity to deliver landscape services and to contribute to rural viability. Numerous models and frameworks have been developed to improve comprehension of the mechanisms and interrelationships between policies, landscape and socio-economic values and benefits. As social-ecological systems, landscapes are closely depending from the socio-institutional and territorial context of the specific rural locality. The paper proposes an enhanced framework for assessing these mechanisms by acknowledging the critical role of the regional macro environment. A literature review and the revisiting of evidence from eight European case studies are applied to establish a comprehensive understanding and exemplification of the links between the policies, landscape, ecosystem services and value flows. Results highlight the need for integrative, inter- and transdisciplinary research approaches. Efficient landscape policies require enhanced regional embeddedness and targeting, acknowledgement of user demands and the capability of regional community and governance structures for policy implementation and natural capital valorisation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available