4.8 Article

Morphology and mobility diameter of carbonaceous aerosols during agglomeration and surface growth

Journal

CARBON
Volume 121, Issue -, Pages 527-535

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.06.004

Keywords

Keywords: Soot morphology; Mobility diameter; Fractal dimension; Mass-mobility exponent; Effective density

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [200021_149144]
  2. ETH Zurich [ETH-08 14-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Agglomeration and surface growth of fractal-like carbonaceous aerosols in the absence of oxidation and condensation of volatiles are investigated by Discrete Element Modeling (DEM) from the free molecular to transition regime, accounting for primary particle polydispersity and chemical bonding (aggregation). That way, carbon black or soot formation is elucidated in plasma reactors, quenched flames and combustion engines running at high exhaust gas recirculation where oxidation of carbon is limited or nonexistent. During nascent soot formation polydisperse spheres and aggregates are formed, attaining an asymptotic geometric standard deviation of 1.2 +/- 0.01, in agreement with experiments in premixed, diffusion flames and wood combustion. When surface growth stops, mature soot grows by agglomeration of these polydisperse spheres and aggregates before oxidation and condensation take over. The evolution from nascent to mature soot morphology quantified by its fractal dimension, D-f, and massmobility exponent, D-fm, is in good agreement with measurements in premixed, diffusion flames and the Cast soot generator. The mobility diameter, d(m), can be related to the average number of primary particles per agglomerate by n(va) - (d(m)/d(va))(0.45) and the relative effective density of soot by peff/p(s) - (d(m)/ d(va))(0.78), where dva is the primary particle diameter and p(s) the soot bulk density. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available