4.8 Article

Efficiency of an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor treating potato starch processing wastewater and related process kinetics, functional microbial community and sludge morphology

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 239, Issue -, Pages 105-116

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.124

Keywords

Anaerobic process kinetics; Microbial diversity; Modified Gompertz model; Methane production; Potato starch processing wastewater

Funding

  1. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Management, China [2013ZX07201007]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment of Harbin Institute of Technology, China [2016DX06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Herein, an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor was employed to treat potato starch processing wastewater and the efficacy, kinetics, microbial diversity and morphology of sludge granules were investigated. When organic loading rate (OLR) ranging from 2.70 to 13.27 kg COD/m(3).d was implemented with various hydraulic retention times (72 h, 48 h and 36 h), COD removal could reach 92.0-97.7%. Highest COD removal (97.7%) was noticed when OLR was 3.65 kg COD/m(3).d, but had declined to 92.0% when OLR was elevated to 13.27 kg COD/m(3).d. Methane and biogas production increased from 0.48 to 2.97 L/L.d and 0.90 to 4.28 L/L.d, respectively. Kinetics and predictions by modified-Gompertz model agreed better with experimental data as opposed to first-order kinetic model. Functional population with highest abundance was Chloroflexi (28.91%) followed by Euryarchaeota (22.13%), Firmicutes (16.7%), Proteobacteria (16.25%) and Bacteroidetes (7.73%). Compared with top sludge, tightly-bound extracellular polymeric substances was high within bottom and middle sludge. Morphology was predominantly Methanosaeta-like cells, Methanosarcina-like cells, rods and cocci colonies. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available