4.5 Article

The future of power generation in Brazil: An analysis of alternatives to Amazonian hydropower development

Journal

ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Volume 41, Issue -, Pages 24-35

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.esd.2017.08.001

Keywords

Stochastic dual dynamic programming; Brazilian power system; Impact assessment

Funding

  1. CNPq [202484/2011-4]
  2. RenewElec project
  3. Department of Engineering and Public Policy at Carnegie Mellon University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Brazilian government has plans to build 26 large hydropower plants in the Amazon basin between 2013 and 2028. These plants will have a total installed capacity of 44 GW, 9000 km(2) of reservoir area, and a total cost of US$ 30-70 billion. In this paper we aim to evaluate alternative generation pathways to avoid the adverse social and environmental impacts associated with reservoirs in the Amazon. Specifically we model the Brazilian electricity network under five capacity expansion scenarios. We assumed the government expansion plans as the baseline and created alternative scenarios where wind and natural gas power plants replace large Amazonian hydropower plants. We compared the scenarios using several performance indicators: greenhouse gas emissions, land use, capital and operational costs, wind curtailments, and energy storage in the hydropower reservoirs. The simulations suggest that a more aggressive policy towards wind generation than the baseline has the potential to replace Amazon hydropower providing advantages to the system operation (e.g., higher storage in hydropower reservoirs). However, when installedwind capacity reaches 24% to 28% of the total installed capacity, more thermal generation is required to balance the hydro-wind variability, increasing the operational costs and greenhouse gas emissions compared to the baseline. (C) 2017 International Energy Initiative. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available