4.6 Article

Acid pretreatment effect on the physicochemical property and catalytic performance of CeO2 for NH3-SCR

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
Volume 542, Issue -, Pages 282-288

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2017.06.003

Keywords

Acid pretreatment; CeO2; Surface acidity; Reduction property; NH3-SCR reaction

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21507130]
  2. Chongqing Science & Technology Commission [cstc2016jcyjA0070, cstc2014pt-gc20002, cstc2014yykfC20003, cstckjcxljrc13]
  3. Open Project Program of Chongqing Key Laboratory of Catalysis and Functional Organic Molecules from Chongqing Technology and Business University [1456029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of CeO2 pretreated with different acids (i.e., CH3COOH (HAc), HNO3, HCl, H3PO4, and H2SO4) were prepared with the purpose of exploring the influence of acid pretreatment on the physicochemical property and catalytic performance of CeO2 for NH3-SCR. And then, these catalysts were characterized by means of XRD, Raman, N-2-physisorption, H-2-TPR, NH3-TPD, in situ DRIFTS, XPS, and NH3-SCR reaction. The obtained results indicate that different acids pretreatment has different influence on the structure, texture, reduction behavior, surface acidity, surface property, and catalytic performance of CeO2. Especially, the sample pretreated by H2SO4 (Le., CeO2-S catalyst) exhibits the best catalytic performance for NH3-SCR reaction at high temperature among these catalysts due to the largest amount of surface acid sites (especially B acid sites) and Ce3+, as well as the increase of defect sites (such as oxygen vacancy) and the most abundant reducible species. Furthermore, CeO2-S catalyst also exhibits excellent catalytic performance (Le., above 80% NO conversion) during the whole test of H2O + SO2 resistance, which indicates that it has the potential to be applied in the practical denitration process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available