4.7 Article

Baryon number fluctuations in chiral effective models and their phenomenological implications

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 96, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.014027

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Extreme Matter Institute EMMI
  2. Polish National Science Center (NCN) under Maestro Grant [DEC-2013/10/A/ST2/00106]
  3. Hessian LOEWE initiative through the Helmholtz International Center for FAIR (HIC for FAIR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the critical properties of net-baryon-number fluctuations at the chiral restoration transition in a medium at finite temperature and net baryon density. The chiral dynamics of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) is modeled by the Polyakov-loop extended quark-meson Lagrangian that includes the coupling of quarks to vector meson and temporal gauge fields. The functional renormalization group is employed to properly account for the O(4) criticality at the phase boundary. We focus on the properties and systematics of ratios of the net-baryon-number cumulants chi(n)(B), for 1 <= n <= 6, near the phase boundary. The results are presented in the context of the recent experimental data of the STAR Collaboration on fluctuations of the net proton number in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC. We show that the model results for the energy dependence of the cumulant ratios are in good overall agreement with the data, with one exception. At center-of-mass energies below 19.6 GeV, we find that the measured fourth-order cumulant deviates considerably from the model results, which incorporate the expected O(4) and Z(2) criticality. We assess the influence of model assumptions and in particular of repulsive vector-interactions, which are used to modify the location of the critical end point in the model, on the cumulants ratios. Finally, we discuss a possibility to test to what extent the fluctuations are affected by nonequilibrium dynamics by comparing certain ratios of cumulants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available