4.2 Article

The effect of roads on spider monkeys' home range and mobility in a heterogeneous regenerating forest

Journal

BIOTROPICA
Volume 49, Issue 4, Pages 546-554

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/btp.12441

Keywords

arboreal mammals; canopy opening; forest structure; Guanacaste Conservation Area; movement barriers; road crossing; roadside habitat

Categories

Funding

  1. Chester Zoo
  2. Leakey Foundation
  3. University of Chester
  4. Department of Political Science (Zientzia Politikarako Zuzendaritza) of Basque Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arboreal fauna living in tropical ecosystems may be particularly affected by roads given their dependency on forest cover and the high vulnerability of such ecosystems to changes. Over a period of 4 yr, we followed subgroups of spider monkeys living in a regenerating dry tropical forest with 8.2 km of roads within their home range. We aimed to understand whether roads shaped the home range of spider monkeys and which road features affected their movement. Only 18 percent (3 km) of the spider monkeys' home range perimeter bordered with roads; these roads had greater habitat disparity between road sides than roads inside the home range. Although monkeys were reluctant to be close to roads, and roadside habitat contained low proportions of mature forest, spider monkeys crossed roads at 69 locations (7.5 crossings per kilometer). The main road characteristic affecting crossings was canopy opening size, with greater probability of crossing where canopy openings were smaller. Our findings support the importance of canopy opening size for road crossing of arboreal taxa, but they also indicate the relevant role roadside forest structure may have. Minimizing canopy opening size and forest disturbance along roads can facilitate the movement of arboreal fauna and preserve the important role of spider monkeys and other arboreal taxa in seed dispersal and thus the maintenance and regeneration of forest diversity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available