4.3 Article

Diagnosis of bile acid diarrhoea by fasting and postprandial measurements of fibroblast growth factor 19

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 12, Pages 1399-1402

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000476

Keywords

bile acids and salts; diarrhoea; fibroblast growth factors; malabsorption syndromes

Funding

  1. Region Zealand Research Foundation (Denmark)
  2. Medical Society of Copenhagen (Denmark)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background A deficiency in the ileal hormone fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) has been described in patients with bile acid diarrhoea (BAD), but fasting FGF19 levels have insufficient diagnostic power. We assess whether single postprandial sampling of FGF19 has greater discriminative value than fasting FGF19 for detection of BAD and we evaluate the reproducibility of fasting FGF19. Materials and methods Twenty-six patients consecutively referred to Se-75 homocholic acid retention test (SeHCAT) were included. Serum FGF19 was measured after an overnight fast and again 1h postprandially and again in the fasting state 1 week later. Results Nine of 26 patients had SeHCAT less than 10% and fasting FGF19 was lower [median 62 pg/ml, interquartile range (IQR): 47-67] than in the 17 diarrhoea controls with SeHCAT at least 10% (median 103 pg/ml, IQR: 77-135, P = 0.006). Postprandial FGF19 in BAD patients (61 pg/ml, IQR: 48-69) was similar to fasting values (P = 0.59) and increased insignificantly in diarrhoea controls (137 pg/ml, IQR: 88-182; P = 0.25). The difference in postprandial FGF19 between patients with BAD and diarrhoea controls was highly significant (P < 0.001). Conclusion The difference in serum FGF19 between groups of patients with BAD and diarrhoea controls is amplified postprandially. Within each group, the difference between fasting and postprandial FGF19 was not statistically significant. Further investigations are warranted on stimulated FGF19 response to elucidate its role in BAD. Copyright (C) 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available