4.7 Article

Familial Risk and Heritability of Colorectal Cancer in the Nordic Twin Study of Cancer

Journal

CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 1256-1264

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.12.041

Keywords

Biometric Modeling; Genetic Susceptibility; Zygosity; Concordance Relative Risk

Funding

  1. Ellison Foundation
  2. Nordic Union of Cancer
  3. Odense University Hospital AgeCare program (Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research)
  4. Academy of Finland [213506, 129680, 265240, 263278]
  5. US BioSHaRE-EU [HEALTH-F4-2010-261433]
  6. European Union's Seventh Framework Programme, BioSHaRE-EU [HEALTH-F4-2010-261433]
  7. Ministry for Higher Education
  8. Prostate Cancer Foundation Young Investigator Award
  9. Hans-Olov Adami has a Distinguished Professor Award at Karolinska Institutet [Dnr:2368/10-221]
  10. National Cancer Institute [R25 CA098566, R25 CA112355]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We analyzed data from twins to determine how much the familial risk of colorectal cancer can be attributed to genetic factors vs environment. We also examined whether heritability is distinct for colon vs rectal cancer, given evidence of distinct etiologies. METHODS: Our data set included 39,990 monozygotic and 61,443 same-sex dizygotic twins from the Nordic Twin Study of Cancer. We compared each cancer's risk in twins of affected co-twins relative to the cohort risk (familial risk ratio [FRR]). We then estimated the proportion of variation in risk that could be attributed to genetic factors (heritability). RESULTS: From earliest registration in 1943 through 2010, there were 1861 individuals diagnosed with colon cancer and 1268 diagnosed with rectal cancer. Monozygotic twins of affected co-twins had an FRR for colorectal cancer of 3.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-3.8) relative to the cohort risk. Dizygotic twins of affected co-twins had an FRR for colorectal cancer of 2.2 (95% CI, 1.7-2.7). We estimated that 40% (95% CI, 33%-48%) of the variation in colorectal cancer risk could be attributed to genetic factors; unique environment only accounted for the remaining liability. For colon cancer, the FRR was 3.3 (95% CI, 2.1-4.5) for monozygotic twins and 2.6 (95% CI, 1.7-3.5) for dizygotic twins. For rectal cancer, comparable estimates were 3.3 (95% CI, 1.5-5.1) for monozygotic twins and 2.6 (95% CI, 1.2-4.0) for dizygotic twins. Heritability estimates for colon and rectal cancer were 16% (95% CI, 0-46%) and 15% (95% CI, 0-50%), common environment estimates were 15% (95% CI, 0-38%) and 11% (95% CI, 0-38%), and unique environment estimates were 68% (95% CI, 57%-79%) and 75% (95% CI, 61%-88%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Interindividual genetic differences could account for 40% of the variation in susceptibility to colorectal cancer; risk for colon and rectal cancers might have less of a genetic component than risk for colorectal cancer. Siblings, and particularly monozygotic co-twins, of individuals with colon or rectal cancer should consider personalized screening.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available