Journal
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages 389-399Publisher
AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JGO.2016.005975
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Susan G. Komen for the Cure
- Gatorade Trust
- Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine
- Innovating Health International
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Purpose We compared a cohort of Haitian immigrants with residents in Haiti with breast cancer (BC) to evaluate the effects of location on presentation, treatment, and outcomes. Patients and Methods Participants were Haitian women with BC living in Miami who presented to the University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital and women with BC living in Haiti who presented to the Innovating Health International Women's Cancer Center. The primary outcome was the relationship between location, cancer characteristics, and survival. The secondary objective was to compare our results with data extracted from the SEER database. Cox regression was used to compare survival. Results One hundred two patients from University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital and 94 patients from Innovating Health International were included. The patients in Haiti, compared with the patients in Miami, were younger (mean age, 50.2 v53.7 years, respectively; P = .042), presented after a longer duration of symptoms (median, 20 v3 months, respectively; P<.001), had more advanced stage (44.7% v25.5% with stage III and 27.6% v18.6% with stage IV BC, respectively), and had more estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors (44.9% v26.5%, respectively; P = .024). The percentage of women who died was 31.9% in Haiti died compared with 17.6% in Miami. Median survival time was 53.7 months for women in Haiti and was not reached in Miami. The risk of death was higher for women in Haiti versus women in Miami (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.09; P = .0024). Conclusion Women with BC in Haiti experience a significantly worse outcome than immigrants in Miami, which seems to be related to a more advanced stage and younger age at diagnosis, more ER-negative tumors, and lack of timely effective treatments. The differences in age and ER status are not a result of access to care and are unexplained. (C) 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available