4.6 Article

Repurposing designed mutants: a valuable strategy for computer-aided laccase engineering the case of POXA1b

Journal

CATALYSIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 515-523

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6cy02410f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. INDOX European project [KBBE-2013-7-613549]
  2. Spanish National Project [CTQ2013-48287-R]
  3. Universita degli Studi di Napoli
  4. Generalitat de Catalunya
  5. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The broad specificity of laccases, a direct consequence of their shallow binding site, makes this class of enzymes a suitable template to build specificity toward putative substrates. In this work, a computational methodology that accumulates beneficial interactions between the enzyme and the substrate in productive conformations is applied to oxidize 2,4-diamino-benzenesulfonic acid with POXA1b laccase. Although the experimental validation of two designed variants yielded negative results, most likely due to the hard oxidizability of the target substrate, molecular simulations suggest that a novel polar binding scaffold was designed to anchor negatively charged groups. Consequently, the oxidation of three such molecules, selected as representative of different classes of substances with different industrial applications, significantly improved. According to molecular simulations, the reason behind such an improvement lies in the more productive enzyme-substrate binding achieved thanks to the designed polar scaffold. In the future, mutant repurposing toward other substrates could be first carried out computationally, as done here, testing molecules that share some similarity with the initial target. In this way, repurposing would not be a mere safety net (as it is in the laboratory and as it was here) but rather a powerful approach to transform laccases into more efficient multitasking enzymes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available