4.6 Article

Predicting CD4 T-Cell Reconstitution Following Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Journal

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 102, Issue 2, Pages 349-357

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cpt.621

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Life Sciences Interface Doctoral Training Centre studentship at the Centre for Mathematics and Physics in the Life Sciences and Experimental Biology (CoMPLEX)
  2. United Kingdom Medical Research Council Fellowship [G1002305]
  3. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust
  4. University College London
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/M008665/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. MRC [MR/M008665/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an increasingly common treatment for children with a range of hematological disorders. Conditioning with cytotoxic chemotherapy and total body irradiation leaves patients severely immunocompromised. T-cell reconstitution can take several years due to delayed restoration of thymic output. Understanding T-cell reconstitution in children is complicated by normal immune system maturation, heterogeneous diagnoses, and sparse uneven sampling due to the long time spans involved. We describe here a mechanistic mathematical model for CD4 T-cell immune reconstitution following pediatric transplantation. Including relevant biology and using mixed-effects modeling allowed the factors affecting reconstitution to be identified. Bayesian predictions for the long-term reconstitution trajectories of individual children were then obtained using early post-transplant data. The model was developed using data from 288 children; its predictive ability validated on data from a further 75 children, with long-term reconstitution predicted accurately in 81% of the patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available