4.7 Article

Early Detection of Molecular Residual Disease in Localized Lung Cancer by Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling

Journal

CANCER DISCOVERY
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages 1394-1403

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0716

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Radiological Society of North America
  2. National Science Foundation [DGE-114747]
  3. Department of Defense
  4. National Cancer Institute [R01CA188298]
  5. US National Institutes of Health [1-DP2-CA186569]
  6. Virginia and D.K. Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research
  7. Stanford Cancer Institute
  8. CRK Faculty Scholar Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Identifying molecular residual disease (MRD) after treatment of localized lung cancer could facilitate early intervention and personalization of adjuvant therapies. Here, we apply cancer personalized profiling by deep sequencing (CAPP-seq) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis to 255 samples from 40 patients treated with curative intent for stage I-III lung cancer and 54 healthy adults. In 94% of evaluable patients experiencing recurrence, ctDNA was detectable in the first posttreatment blood sample, indicating reliable identification of MRD. Posttreatment ctDNA detection preceded radiographic progression in 72% of patients by a median of 5.2 months, and 53% of patients harbored ctDNA mutation profiles associated with favorable responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immune checkpoint blockade. Collectively, these results indicate that ctDNA MRD in patients with lung cancer can be accurately detected using CAPP-seq and may allow personalized adjuvant treatment while disease burden is lowest. SIGNIFICANCE: This study shows that ctDNA analysis can robustly identify posttreatment MRD in patients with localized lung cancer, identifying residual/recurrent disease earlier than standard-of-care radiologic imaging, and thus could facilitate personalized adjuvant treatment at early time points when disease burden is lowest. (C) 2017 AACR.4

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available