4.7 Article

Genetic Predictors of Response to Systemic Therapy in Esophagogastric Cancer

Journal

CANCER DISCOVERY
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 49-58

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0787

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Conquer Cancer Foundation ASCO Career Development Award
  2. Cycle for Survival Award
  3. Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program [CA 150646]
  4. Marie-Josee and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology
  5. National Cancer Institute Cancer Center [P30-CA008748]
  6. Robertson Foundation
  7. Center for Metastasis Research of the Sloan Kettering Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The incidence of esophagogastric cancer is rapidly rising, but only a minority of patients derive durable benefit from current therapies. Chemotherapy as well as anti-HER2 and PD-1 antibodies are standard treatments. To identify predictive biomarkers of drug sensitivity and mechanisms of resistance, we implemented prospective tumor sequencing of patients with metastatic esophagogastric cancer. There was no association between homologous recombination deficiency defects and response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients with microsatellite instability-high tumors were intrinsically resistant to chemo therapy but more likely to achieve durable responses to immunotherapy. The single Epstein-Barr virus-positive patient achieved a durable, complete response to immunotherapy. The level of ERBB2 amplification as determined by sequencing was predictive of trastuzumab benefit. Selection for a tumor subclone lacking ERBB2 amplification, deletion of ERBB2 exon 16, and comutations in the receptor tyrosine kinase, RAS, and PI3K pathways were associated with intrinsic and/or acquired trastuzumab resistance. Prospective genomic profiling can identify patients most likely to derive durable benefit to immunotherapy and trastuzumab and guide strategies to overcome drug resistance. (C) 2017 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available