4.7 Review

Endoplasmic reticulum proteostasis impairment in aging

Journal

AGING CELL
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages 615-623

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acel.12599

Keywords

aging; endoplasmic reticulum; endoplasmic reticulum stress; protein misfolding disorders; unfolded protein response

Funding

  1. FONDAP [15150012]
  2. US Office of Naval Research-Global (ONR-G) [N62909-16-1-2003]
  3. Millennium Institute [P09-015-F]
  4. FONDEF [ID16110223, D11E1007]
  5. U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-16-1-0384]
  6. CONICYT-Brazil [441921/2016-7]
  7. FONDECYT [11160760, 3150637, 1140549]
  8. ALS Therapy Alliance [2014-F-059]
  9. Muscular Dystrophy Association [382453]
  10. Michael J Fox Foundation [9277]
  11. ALSRP Therapeutic Idea Award [AL150111]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Perturbed neuronal proteostasis is a salient feature shared by both aging and protein misfolding disorders. The proteostasis network controls the health of the proteome by integrating pathways involved in protein synthesis, folding, trafficking, secretion, and their degradation. A reduction in the buffering capacity of the proteostasis network during aging may increase the risk to undergo neurodegeneration by enhancing the accumulation of misfolded proteins. As almost one-third of the proteome is synthetized at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), maintenance of its proper function is fundamental to sustain neuronal function. In fact, ER stress is a common feature of most neurodegenerative diseases. The unfolded protein response (UPR) operates as central player to maintain ER homeostasis or the induction of cell death of chronically damaged cells. Here, we discuss recent evidence placing ER stress as a driver of brain aging, and the emerging impact of neuronal UPR in controlling global proteostasis at the whole organismal level. Finally, we discuss possible therapeutic interventions to improve proteostasis and prevent pathological brain aging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available