4.2 Article

Intrathecal dexamethasone vs. meperidine for prevention of shivering during transurethral prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial

Journal

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
Volume 61, Issue 7, Pages 749-757

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aas.12920

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundShivering is a common complication after spinal anesthesia. Also, during transurethral prostatectomy a large amount of irrigating fluids is used which may cause hypothermia and shivering. We hypothesized that intrathecal dexamethasone could effectively attenuate post-spinal shivering following transurethral prostatectomy as intrathecal meperidine. MethodsNinety male patients, ASA II-III, 50-75 years old were included in this prospective and randomized double-blind study. Patients were divided into three equal groups; Group D received 8 mg dexamethasone, Group M received 0.2 mg/kg meperidine, and Group C received 2 ml of normal saline, each in addition to intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%. Shivering incidence, intensity and recurrence, dose of IV meperidine required to treat shivering, and adverse events were recorded for 150 min after the start of spinal anesthesia. ResultsThe number of patients with shivering was higher in Group C (13) than in Group D (2) and Group M (3) with no differences between Group D and M; P = 0.001. Intensity and recurrence of shivering and dose of IV meperidine used to treat shivering were higher in Group C compared to Group D and Group M; P = 0.01, P = 0.064, and P = 0.004, respectively. Adverse events were not different between groups except sedation and pruritus which occurred only in Group M compared to Group D and Group C; P = 0.005 and P = 0.001, respectively. ConclusionIntrathecal dexamethasone was as effective as intrathecal meperidine in attenuation of shivering compared to placebo in patients scheduled for prostate surgery under spinal anesthesia with less adverse events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available