4.5 Review

Chimerism-based tolerance in organ transplantation: preclinical and clinical studies

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 189, Issue 2, Pages 190-196

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cei.12969

Keywords

chimerism; cyclophosphamide; durable mixed chimerism; full donor chimerism; GVHD; haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; living-donor kidney transplantation; NHP; persistent mixed chimerism; TBI; TI; TLI; transient mixed chimerism; transplantation tolerance induction

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH/NIAID [NO1 AI1541]
  2. Immune Tolerance Network (ITN)
  3. NIH NHP Transplantation Tolerance Cooperative Study Group [5U19AI102405]
  4. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  5. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Induction of allograft tolerance has been considered the ultimate goal in organ transplantation. Although numerous protocols to induce allograft tolerance have been reported in mice, a chimerism-based approach through donor haematopoietic stem cell transplantation has been the only approach to date that induced allograft tolerance reproducibly following kidney transplantation in man. Renal allograft tolerance has been achieved by induction of either transient mixed chimerism or persistent full donor chimerism. Although the risk of rejection may be low in tolerance achieved via durable full donor chimerism, the development of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) has limited the wider clinical application of this approach. In contrast, tolerance induced by transient mixed chimerism has not been associated with GVHD, but the risk of allograft rejection is more difficult to predict after the disappearance of haematopoietic chimerism. Current efforts are directed towards the development of more clinically feasible and reliable approaches to induce more durable mixed chimerism in order to widen the clinical applicability of these treatment regimens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available