4.7 Article

Influences of dissolved oxygen concentration on biocathodic microbial communities in microbial fuel cells

Journal

BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY
Volume 116, Issue -, Pages 39-51

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2017.04.001

Keywords

Biocathode; Illumina 16S rRNA sequencing; Spirulina; Electroactive biofilms; Oxygen reduction reaction ORR

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of University and Research (MIUR) [RBSI14JKU3]
  2. Research Fund for the Italian Electrical System
  3. Italian Ministry of University and Research (MIUR) (BioFuelCellApp)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dissolved oxygen (DO) at cathodic interface is a critical factor influencing microbial fuel cells (MFC) performance. In this work, three MFCs were operated with cathode under different DO conditions: i) air-breathing (A-MFC); ii) water-submerged (W-MFC) and iii) assisted by photosynthetic microorganisms (P-MFC). A plateau of maximum current was reached at 1.06 +/- 0.03 mA, 1.48 +/- 0.06 mA and 1.66 +/- 0.04 mA, increasing respectively for W-MFC, P-MFC and A-MFC. Electrochemical and microbiological tools (Illumina sequencing, confocal microscopy and biofilm cryosectioning) were used to explore anodic and cathodic biofilm in each MFC type. In all cases, biocathodes improved oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) as compared to abiotic condition and A-MFC was the best performing system. Photosynthetic cultures in the cathodic chamber supplied high DO level, up to 16 mg(O2) L-1, which sustained aerobic microbial community in P-MFC biocathode. Halomonas, Pseudomonas and other microaerophilic genera reached > 50% of the total OTUs. The presence of sulfur reducing bacteria (Desulfuromonas) and purple non-sulfur bacteria in A-MFC biocathode suggested that the recirculation of sulfur compounds could shuttle electrons to sustain the reduction of oxygen as final electron acceptor. The low DO concentration limited the cathode in W-MFC A model of two different possible microbial mechanisms is proposed which can drive predominantly cathodic ORR. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available