4.5 Article

Breast cancer cell obatoclax response characterization using passivated-electrode insulator-based dielectrophoresis

Journal

ELECTROPHORESIS
Volume 38, Issue 16, Pages 1988-1995

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201600447

Keywords

Breast cancer; Dielectrophoresis (DEP); Drug sensitivity; Estrogen receptor positive (ER plus ); GX15-070 (Obatoclax)

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [ECCS-1310090]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys [1310090] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inherent electrical properties of cells can be beneficial to characterize different cell lines and their response to experimental drugs. This paper presents a novel method to characterize the response of breast cancer cells to drug stimuli through use of off-chip passivated-electrode insulator-based dielectrophoresis (ODEP) and the application of AC electric fields. This work is the first to demonstrate the ability of ODEP to differentiate between two closely related breast cancer cell lines, LCC1 and LCC9 while assessing their drug sensitivity to an experimental anti-cancer agent, Obatoclax. Although both cell lines are derivatives of estrogen-responsive MCF-7 breast cancer cells, growth of LCC1 is estrogen independent and anti-estrogen responsive, while LCC9 is both estrogen-independent and anti-estrogen resistant. Under the same operating conditions, LCC1 and LCC9 had different DEP profiles. LCC1 cells had a trapping onset (crossover) frequency of 700kHz and trapping efficiencies between 30-40%, while LCC9 cells had a lower crossover frequency (100kHz) and showed higher trapping efficiencies of 40-60%. When exposed to the Obatoclax, both cell lines exhibited dose-dependent shifts in DEP crossover frequency and trapping efficiency. Here, DEP results supplemented with cell morphology and proliferation assays help us to understand the response of these breast cancer cells to Obatoclax.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available