4.6 Article

X-chromosome gene dosage as a determinant of impaired pre and postnatal growth and adult height in Turner syndrome

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 174, Issue 3, Pages 281-288

Publisher

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-15-1000

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. French Ministry of Health (Rare Disease Plan)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Short stature is a key aspect of the phenotype of patients with Turner syndrome (TS). SHOX haploinsufficiency is responsible for about two-thirds of the height deficit. The aim was to investigate the effect of X-chromosome gene dosage on anthropometric parameters at birth, spontaneous height, and adult height (AH) after growth hormone (GH) treatment. Design: We conducted a national observational multicenter study. Methods: Birth parameter SDS for gestational age, height, and AH before and after GH treatment respectively, and height deficit with respect to target height (SDS) were classified by karyotype subgroup in a cohort of 1501 patients with TS: 45, X (36%), isoXq (19%), 45, X/46, XX (15%), XrX (7%), presence of Y (6%), or other karyotypes (17%). Results: Birth weight, length (P<0.0001), and head circumference (P<0.001), height and height deficit with respect to target height (SDS) before GH treatment, at a median age of 8.8 (5.3-11.8) years and after adjustment for age and correction for multiple testing (P<0.0001), and AH deficit with respect to target height at a median age of 19.3 (18.0-21.8) years and with additional adjustment for dose and duration of GH treatment (P=0.006), were significantly associated with karyotype subgroup. Growth retardation tended to be more severe in patients with XrX, isoXq, and, to a lesser extent, 45, X karyotypes than in patients with 45, X/46, XX karyotypes or a Y chromosome. Conclusion: These data suggest that haploinsufficiency for an unknown Xp gene increases the risk of fetal and postnatal growth deficit and short AH with respect to target height after GH therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available