4.6 Article

Role of heterojunction ZrTiO4/ZrTi2O6/TiO2 photocatalyst towards the degradation of paraquat dichloride and optimization study by Box-Behnken design

Journal

ARABIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages 935-943

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2016.02.011

Keywords

Photocatalyst; Paraquat dichloride; Zirconia; Titania; Box Behnken design

Funding

  1. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Universiti Teknologi Malaysia under GUP Grant [Q.J130000.2526.07H78]
  2. Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study revealed that the existence of heterojunction of ZrTiO4/ZrTi2O6/TiO2 in the photocatalyst system has significantly enhanced the photodegradation of paraquat dichloride with respect to the increment of it thermal stability as shown in the XRD and XPS analyses. Several parameters such as ZrO2/TiO2 ratios (10:90, 20:80 and 30:70) and catalyst dosage (0.1-0.4 g) have been studied to achieve the optimum degradation of paraquat dichloride. The kinetic study was determined by using various ZrO2/TiO2 ratios calcined at 750 degrees C and showed that the photodegradation of paraquat over ZrO2/TiO2 photocatalyst follows a pseudo first-order kinetic. The optimum condition was obtained using ZrO2/TiO2 (20:80), calcined at 750 degrees C and with 0.3 g catalyst dosage which gave 84.41% degradation after 240 min under UV irradiation,)lambda(UV) = 365 nm. The N-2 adsorption desorption analysis shows the mixture of Type III and IV isotherms with hysteresis loop type H2(b). Meanwhile, the Box-Behnken design showed the optimum photodegradation of paraquat was obtained at the calcination temperature of 750 degrees C, with the ZrO2/TiO2 ratio of 20:80 and 0.3 g catalyst dosage which was 0.24% lower than our experimental verification result. (C) 2016 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available