4.5 Article

Better together: Simultaneous presentation of speech and gesture in math instruction supports generalization and retention

Journal

LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION
Volume 50, Issue -, Pages 65-74

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.03.005

Keywords

Gesture; Mathematics; Learning; Transfer; Multimodality

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-HD047450]
  2. National Science Foundation [BCS-0925595, SBE-0541957]
  3. Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education [R305 B090025]
  4. Direct For Education and Human Resources
  5. Division Of Research On Learning [1561405] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When teachers gesture during instruction, children retain and generalize what they are taught (Goldin-Meadow, 2014). But why does gesture have such a powerful effect on learning? Previous research shows that children learn most from a math lesson when teachers present one problem-solving strategy in speech while simultaneously presenting a different, but complementary, strategy in gesture (Singer & Goldin-Meadow, 2005). One possibility is that gesture is powerful in this context because it presents information simultaneously with speech. Alternatively, gesture may be effective simply because it involves the body, in which case the timing of information presented in speech and gesture may be less important for learning. Here we find evidence for the importance of simultaneity: 3rd grade children retain and generalize what they learn from a math lesson better when given instruction containing simultaneous speech and gesture than when given instruction containing sequential speech and gesture. Interpreting these results in the context of theories of multimodal learning, we find that gesture capitalizes on its synchrony with speech to promote learning that lasts and can be generalized. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available