4.8 Article

Best Practices for Mitigating Irreversible Capacity Loss of Negative Electrodes in Li-Ion Batteries

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 7, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201602607

Keywords

anodes; irreversible capacity loss; Li-ion batteries; solid electrolyte interface

Funding

  1. Hebrew University of Jerusalem (HUJ, Israel)
  2. Nanyang Technological University (NTU, Singapore)
  3. National Research Foundation of Singapore (NRF, Singapore)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government (Ministry of Science, ICT AMP
  5. Future Planning) [2016R1A4A1012224]
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016R1A4A1012224] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Development of high performance lithium-ion (Li-ion) power packs is a topic receiving significant attention in research today. Future development of the Li-ion power packs relies on the development of high capacity and high rate anodes. More specifically, materials undergo either conversion or an alloying mechanism with Li. However, irreversible capacity loss (ICL) is one of the prime issues for this type of negative electrode. Traditional insertion-type materials also experience ICL, but it is considered negligible. Therefore, eliminating ICL is crucial before the fabrication of practical Li-ion cells with conventional cathodes such as LiFePO4, LiMn2O4, etc. There are numerous methods for eliminating ICL such as pre-treating the electrode, usage of stabilized Li metal powder, chemical and electrochemical lithiation, sacrificial salts for both anode and cathode, etc. The research strategies that have been explored are reviewed here in regards to the elimination of ICL from the high capacity anodes as described. Additionally, mitigating ICL observed from the carbonaceous anodes is discussed and compared.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available