4.8 Article

Enhancing the Regeneration Process of Consumed NaBH4 for Hydrogen Storage

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 7, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201700299

Keywords

hydrogen generation; hydrogen storage; regeneration; sodium borohydride (NaBH4)

Funding

  1. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC51621001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51431001]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China [2016A030312011, 2014A030311004, 2014GKXM011]
  4. Guangdong Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sodium borohydride (NaBH4) is regarded as an excellent hydrogen-generated material, but its irreversibility of hydrolysis and high cost of regeneration restrict its large-scale application. In this study a convenient and economical method for NaBH4 regeneration is developed for the first time without hydrides used as starting materials for the reduction process. The real hydrolysis by-products (NaBO2 center dot 2H(2)O and NaBO2 center dot 4H(2)O), instead of dehydrated sodium metaborate (NaBO2), are applied for the regeneration of NaBH4 with Mg at room temperature and atmospheric pressure. Therefore, the troublesome heat-wasting process to obtain NaBO2 using a drying procedure at over 350 degrees C from NaBO2 center dot xH(2)O is omitted. Moreover, the highest regeneration yields of NaBH4 are achieved to date with 68.55% and 64.06% from reaction with NaBO2 center dot 2H(2)O and NaBO2 center dot 4H(2)O, respectively. The cost of NaBH4 regeneration shows a 34-fold reduction compared to the previous study that uses MgH2 as the reduction agent, where H-2 is obtained from a separate process. Furthermore, the regeneration mechanism of NaBH4 is clarified and the intermediate compound, NaBH3(OH), is successfully observed for the first time during the regeneration process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available