4.8 Article

Quantifying Efficiency Loss of Perovskite Solar Cells by a Modified Detailed Balance Model

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201701586

Keywords

detailed balance; device model; efficiency loss; perovskite solar cells

Funding

  1. University Grant Council of the University of Hong Kong [201611159194, 201511159225]
  2. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [C7045-14E]
  3. ECF Project from Environment and Conservation Fund [33/2015]
  4. CAS-Croucher Funding Scheme for Joint Laboratories [CAS14601]
  5. [17211916]
  6. [17204117]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A modified detailed balance model is built to understand and quantify efficiency loss of perovskite solar cells. The modified model captures the light-absorption-dependent short-circuit current, contact and transport-layer-modified carrier transport, as well as recombination and photon-recycling-influenced open-circuit voltage. The theoretical and experimental results show that for experimentally optimized perovskite solar cells with the power conversion efficiency of 19%, optical loss of 25%, nonradiative recombination loss of 35%, and ohmic loss of 35% are the three dominant loss factors for approaching the 31% efficiency limit of perovskite solar cells. It is also found that the optical loss climbs up to 40% for a thin-active-layer design. Moreover, a misconfigured transport layer introduces above 15% of energy loss. Finally, the perovskite-interface-induced surface recombination, ohmic loss, and current leakage should be further reduced to upgrade device efficiency and eliminate hysteresis effect. This work contributes to fundamental understanding of device physics of perovskite solar cells. The developed model offers a systematic design and analysis tool to photovoltaic science and technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available