4.8 Article

Burn-in Free Nonfullerene-Based Organic Solar Cells

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 7, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201700770

Keywords

degradation; light-soaking stability; nonfullerene acceptor; organic solar cells; P3HT

Funding

  1. Cluster of Excellence Engineering of Advanced Materials at the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg - German Research Foundation (DFG) [SFB953]
  2. Portuguese Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/71816/2010]
  3. Solar Technologies go Hybrid (SolTech)
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1648728] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/71816/2010] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Organic solar cells that are free of burn-in, the commonly observed rapid performance loss under light, are presented. The solar cells are based on poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) with varying molecular weights and a nonfullerene acceptor (rhodanine-benzothiadiazole-coupled indacenodithiophene, IDTBR) and are fabricated in air. P3HT: IDTBR solar cells light-soaked over the course of 2000 h lose about 5% of power conversion efficiency (PCE), in stark contrast to [6,6]-Phenyl C61 butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM)-based solar cells whose PCE shows a burn-in that extends over several hundreds of hours and levels off at a loss of approximate to 34%. Replacing PCBM with IDTBR prevents shortcircuit current losses due to fullerene dimerization and inhibits disorderinduced open-circuit voltage losses, indicating a very robust device operation that is insensitive to defect states. Small losses in fill factor over time are proposed to originate from polymer or interface defects. Finally, the combination of enhanced efficiency and stability in P3HT: IDTBR increases the lifetime energy yield by more than a factor of 10 when compared with the same type of devices using a fullerene-based acceptor instead.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available