4.8 Article

Selenium Impregnated Monolithic Carbons as Free-Standing Cathodes for High Volumetric Energy Lithium and Sodium Metal Batteries

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201701918

Keywords

lithium selenium batteries; mesoporous carbon; polyselenide; sodium selenium batteries; volumetric energy

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering [DE-SC0018074]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0018074] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Energy density (energy per volume) is a key consideration for portable, automotive, and stationary battery applications. Selenium (Se) lithium and sodium metal cathodes are created that are monolithic and free-standing, and with record Se loading of 70 wt%. The carbon host is derived from nanocellulose, an abundant and sustainable forestry product. The composite is extremely dense (2.37 g cm(-3)), enabling theoretical volumetric capacity of 1120 mA h cm(-3). Such architecture is fully distinct from previous Se-carbon nano- or micropowders, intrinsically offering up to 2x higher energy density. For Li storage, the cathode delivers reversible capacity of 1028 mA h cm(-3) (620 mA h g(-1)) and 82% retention over 300 cycles. For Na storage, 848 mA h cm(-3) (511 mA h g(-1)) is obtained with 98% retention after 150 cycles. The electrodes yield superb volumetric energy densities, being 1727 W h L-1 for Li-Se and 980 W h L-1 for Na-Se normalized by total composite mass and volume. Despite the low surface area, over 60% capacity is maintained as the current density is increased from 0.1 to 2 C (30 min charge) with Li or Na. Remarkably, the electrochemical kinetics with Li and Na are comparable, including the transition from interfacial to diffusional control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available