4.8 Article

Ultrathin Graphene-Protein Supercapacitors for Miniaturized Bioelectronics

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 7, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201700358

Keywords

bioelectrochemical capacitors; biosupercapacitor-energy harvester; graphene-proteins; implantable supercapacitors; toxicity

Funding

  1. U.S. PHS from National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering NIH [EB016707, EB014586]
  2. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), NIH [ES03154, ES023350]
  3. NSF EAGER grant [DMR-1441879]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nearly all implantable bioelectronics are powered by bulky batteries which limit device miniaturization and lifespan. Moreover, batteries contain toxic materials and electrolytes that can be dangerous if leakage occurs. Herein, an approach to fabricate implantable protein-based bioelectrochemical capacitors (bECs) employing new nanocomposite heterostructures in which 2D reduced graphene oxide sheets are interlayered with chemically modified mammalian proteins, while utilizing biological fluids as electrolytes is described. This protein-modified reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite material shows no toxicity to mouse embryo fibroblasts and COS-7 cell cultures at a high concentration of 1600 mu g mL(-1) which is 160 times higher than those used in bECs, unlike the unmodified graphene oxide which caused toxic cell damage even at low doses of 10 mu g mL(-1). The bEC devices are 1 mu m thick, fully flexible, and have high energy density comparable to that of lithium thin film batteries. COS-7 cell culture is not affected by long-term exposure to encapsulated bECs over 4 d of continuous charge/discharge cycles. These bECs are unique, protein-based devices, use serum as electrolyte, and have the potential to power a new generation of long-life, miniaturized implantable devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available