4.6 Article

A novel methodology for assessing laryngeal and vagus nerve integrity in patients under general anesthesia

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 128, Issue 7, Pages 1399-1405

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.03.002

Keywords

Recurrent laryngeal nerve; Vagus nerve; Intraoperative monitoring; Brainstem; Vocal fold; Anesthesia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To describe a novel methodology for intraoperative neuro-monitoring of laryngeal and vagus nerves by utilizing the laryngeal adductor reflex (LAR). Methods: Case series of 15 patients undergoing thyroid and cervical spine surgeries under total intravenous general anesthesia. Vocal fold mucosa was electrically stimulated to elicit a LAR using endotracheal tube based electrodes. Contralateral R1 (cR1) and R2 (cR2) responses were recorded using the endotracheal tube electrode contralateral to the simulating electrode. Results: The LAR was reliably elicited in 100% of patients for the duration of each surgical procedure. Mean onset latency of cR1 response was 22.4 +/- 2.5 ms (right) and 22.2 +/- 2.4 ms (left). cR2 responses were noted in 10 patients (66.7%). No peri-operative complications or adverse outcomes were observed. Conclusions: The LAR is a novel neuro-monitoring technique for the vagus nerve. Advantages over current monitoring techniques including simplicity, ability to continuously monitor neural function without placement of additional neural probes and ability to assess integrity of both sensory and motor pathways. Significance: The LAR represents a novel method for intraoperatively monitoring laryngeal and vagus nerves. The LAR monitors the entire vagus nerve reflex arc and is thus applicable to all surgeries where vagal nerve integrity may be compromised. (C) 2017 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available