4.8 Review

Active sites on graphene-based materials as metal-free catalysts

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 46, Issue 15, Pages 4501-4529

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7cs00156h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [CTQ 2015-69153-CO2-1, CTQ2014-53292-R]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana (Prometeo)
  3. European Community by fondos FEDER [CTQ2014-53292-R]
  4. German Excellence Cluster Unicat
  5. Fundacion Ramon Areces (XVIII Concurso Nacional para la Adjudicacion de Ayudas a la Investigacion en Ciencias de la Vida y de la Materia)
  6. University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi
  7. Department of Science and Technology, India [EMR/2016/006500]
  8. Max Planck Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graphenes and related materials have attracted growing interest as metal-free catalysts. The present review is focused on describing the active sites that have been proposed to be responsible for the catalytic activity observed for such systems. It will be shown that diverse defects and chemical functionalities on the graphene layers can catalyze reactions, including oxygenated functional groups, carbon vacancies and holes, edge effects, and the presence of dopant elements. Besides discrete active sites, the catalytic activity arising from the collective properties of graphenes as materials by adsorbing substrates and reagents and activating them by charge transfer is also commented. The review has an introductory general section summarizing the general methodologies that have been used to support the proposed structure of the active sites, including theoretical calculations, comparison of the catalytic activity of graphene samples with different compositions, the use of organic molecules as models of the active centers, and selective masking of functional groups. The review is concluded with our view on future developments in the field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available