4.8 Review

Heterogeneous catalytic hydrogenation of CO2 by metal oxides: defect engineering - perfecting imperfection

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 46, Issue 15, Pages 4631-4644

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7cs00026j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ontario Ministry of Research Innovation (MRI)
  2. Ministry of Economic Development, Employment and Infrastructure (MEDI)
  3. Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change
  4. Connaught Innovation Fund
  5. Connaught Global Challenge Fund
  6. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  7. Royal Society University Research Fellowship
  8. EPSRC [EP/M009580/1]
  9. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M009580/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. EPSRC [EP/M009580/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal oxides with their myriad compositions, structures and bonding exhibit an incredibly diverse range of properties. It is however the defects in metal oxides that endow them with a variety of functions and it is the ability to chemically tailor the type, population and distribution of defects on the surface and in the bulk of metal oxides that delivers utility in different applications. In this Tutorial Review, we discuss how metal oxides with designed defects can be synthesized and engineered, to enable heterogeneous catalytic hydrogenation of gaseous carbon dioxide to chemicals and fuels. If this approach to utilization and valorization of carbon dioxide could be developed at industrially significant rates, efficiencies and scales and made economically competitive with fossil-based chemicals and fuels, then carbon dioxide refineries envisioned in the future would be able to contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, ameliorate climate changes, provide energy security and enable protection of the environment. This would bring the vision of a sustainable future closer to reality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available