4.2 Article

Posttraumatic growth following pregnancy termination for fetal abnormality: the predictive role of coping strategies and perinatal grief

Journal

ANXIETY STRESS AND COPING
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages 536-550

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10615806.2016.1278433

Keywords

Termination of pregnancy; fetal abnormality; posttraumatic growth; trauma; coping strategies; perinatal grief

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Research about termination for fetal abnormality (TFA) suggests that it is a traumatic event with potential negative psychological consequences. However, evidence also indicates that following traumatic events individuals may experience growth. Although TFA's negative psychological outcomes are well documented, little is known of the potential for growth following this event. Therefore, the study's objectives were to measure posttraumatic growth (PTG) post-TFA, examine the relationship between PTG, perinatal grief and coping, and determine the predictors of PTG.Design: An online, retrospective survey was conducted with 161 women.Methods: Eligible participants were women over 18 who had undergone TFA. Participants were recruited from a support organisation. They completed the Brief COPE, Short Perinatal Grief Scale and Posttraumatic Growth Inventory. Data were analysed using regression analyses.Results: Moderate levels of PTG were observed for relating to others, personal strengths and appreciation of life. Positive reframing was a significant predictor of PTG. Despite using mainly adaptive coping strategies, women's grief levels were high.Conclusions: Adaptive coping strategies such as, positive reframing are relevant to TFA. They may act as protective factors against distress and as foundations for growth, implicating that interventions such as Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, which aim to reframe women's experience, may be beneficial.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available