4.5 Article

Enhanced Antimicrobial Activity on Non-Conducting and Conducting Air Filters by Using Air Ions and Grapefruit Seed Extract

Journal

AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages 1917-1924

Publisher

TAIWAN ASSOC AEROSOL RES-TAAR
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2016.10.0466

Keywords

Grapefruit seed extract; Air filter; Ion; Antimicrobial; Inactivation

Funding

  1. EcoInnovation Project
  2. Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials [NK205B]
  3. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [NK205B] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The application of grapefruit seed extract (GSE) and air ions to filters was investigated with the goal of collecting indoor bioaerosols. GSE exhibits antimicrobial activity because it contains flavonoids such as naringin. Air ions are usually generated by electric ionizers and can inactivate bacteria, viruses, and fungi. In this study, GSE particles were coated onto three different filters: polypropylene (PP), activated carbon fiber (ACF), and metal foam (MF). Ions were supplied to the filter surface using an ionizer. The rate of surface inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus was measured. When only GSE was applied to the filters, the inactivation rate was about 60%; when air ions were applied, the rate was about 70-80%. When both GSE and ions were applied simultaneously, the inactivation rate increased to 80-90%. The physical collection efficiencies of the as-purchased filters were in the following order: PP > ACF > MF. However, when ions were supplied to the filters, the collection efficiencies increased to over 98% for each filter. The inactivation rate of the ACF filter was the highest (92.5%). Therefore, we conclude that the ACF filter is the most efficient of these three filters for inactivating S. aureus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available