4.8 Article

Mechanism of Chloride Inhibition of Bilirubin Oxidases and Its Dependence on Potential and pH

Journal

ACS CATALYSIS
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages 3916-3923

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.7b01286

Keywords

bilirubin oxidase; chloride inhibition; pH influence; electrochemistry; catalysis; resting forms

Funding

  1. Region Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur
  2. Region Aquitaine
  3. ANR [RATIOCELLS-ANR-12-BS08-0011-01, CAROUCELL ANR-13-BIOME-0003-02]
  4. Labex AMADEus [ANR-10-IDEX-003-02]
  5. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R01DK31450]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bilirubin oxidases (BODs) belong to the multicopper wddase (MCO) family and efficiently reduce 02 at neutral pH and under physiological conditions where chloride concentrations are >100 mM. BODs were consequently considered to be resistant, as opposed to laccases. However, there has not been a detailed study of the related effect of chloride and pH on the redox state of immobilized BODs. Here, we investigate by electrochemistry the catalytic mechanism of O-2 reduction by the thermostable Bacillus pumilus BOD immobilized on carbon nanofibers in the presence of NaCl. The addition of chloride results in the formation of a redox state of the enzyme, previously observed for different BODs and laccases, which is active only after a reductive step. This behavior has not been previously investigated. We show that the kinetics of formation of this state is strongly dependent on pH, temperature, Cl- concentration, and applied redox potential. Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy allows us to correlate the inhibition by chloride with the formation of the alternative resting form of the enzyme. We demonstrate that O-2 is not required for its formation and show that the application of an oxidative potential is sufficient. In addition, our results suggest that reactivation may proceed through T3 beta.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available