4.8 Article

Contact Effect of ReS2/Metal Interface

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 9, Issue 31, Pages 26325-26332

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b06432

Keywords

ReS2; rhenium disulfide; TMDc; contact resistance; field-effect transistor; Schottky diode; Kelvin probe force microscopy; density functional theory

Funding

  1. Korean Government (MSIP) through National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) [2015R1A5A1037668]
  2. Priority Research Centers Program [2009-0093823]
  3. Korea Ministry of Environment [2016002130005]
  4. Development of diagnostic system [2015-11-1684]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rhenium disulfide (ReS2) has attracted immense interest as a promising two-dimensional material for optoelectronic devices owing to its outstanding photonic response based on its energy band gap's insensitivity to the layer thickness. Here, we theoretically calculated the electrical band structure of mono-, bi-, and trilayer ReS2 and experimentally found the work function to be 4.8 eV, which was shown to be independent of the layer thickness. We also evaluated the contact resistance of a ReS2 field-effect transistor using a Y-function method with various metal electrodes, including graphene. The ReS2 channel is a strong-n-type semiconductor, thus a lower work function than that of metals tends to lead to a lower contact resistance. Moreover, the graphene electrodes, which were not chemically or physically bonded to ReS2, showed the lowest contact resistance, regardless of the work function, suggesting a significant Fermi-level pinning effect at the ReS2/metal interface. In addition, an asymmetric Schottky graphene for ohmic contacts and Pt or Pd for Schottky contacts. The ReS2-based transistor used in this study on the work function of ReS2 achieved the possibility of designing the next-generation nanologic devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available