4.8 Article

Atomic layer confined vacancies for atomic-level insights into carbon dioxide electroreduction

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14503

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation [21422107, U1632147, 21331005, 91422303, 21473167, 11321503, U1532265]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-0546]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS [CX2340000100]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK2340000063, WK2340000073]
  5. Scientific Research Grant of Hefei Science Center of CAS [2016HSC-IU002]
  6. National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents [BX201600143]
  7. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded project [2016M602017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role of oxygen vacancies in carbon dioxide electroreduction remains somewhat unclear. Here we construct a model of oxygen vacancies confined in atomic layer, taking the synthetic oxygen-deficient cobalt oxide single-unit-cell layers as an example. Density functional theory calculations demonstrate the main defect is the oxygen(II) vacancy, while X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy reveals their distinct oxygen vacancy concentrations. Proton transfer is theoretically/experimentally demonstrated to be a rate-limiting step, while energy calculations unveil that the presence of oxygen(II) vacancies lower the rate-limiting activation barrier from 0.51 to 0.40 eV via stabilizing the formate anion radical intermediate, confirmed by the lowered onset potential from 0.81 to 0.78V and decreased Tafel slope from 48 to 37mVdec(-1). Hence, vacancy-rich cobalt oxide single-unit-cell layers exhibit current densities of 2.7mAcm(-2) with ca. 85% formate selectivity during 40-h tests. This work establishes a clear atomic-level correlation between oxygen vacancies and carbon dioxide electroreduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available