4.8 Article

Chinese CO2 emission flows have reversed since the global financial crisis

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01820-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFA0602604, 2016YFA0602603]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [41629501, 71521002, 71642004, 71533005]
  3. UK Economic and Social Research Council [ES/L016028/1]
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/N00714X/1]
  5. British Academy [AF150310]
  6. Czech Science Foundation under the project VEENEX (GA CR) [16-17978S]
  7. ESRC [ES/L016028/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. NERC [NE/N00714X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/L016028/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/N00714X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study seeks to estimate the carbon implications of recent changes in China's economic development patterns and role in global trade in the post-financial-crisis era. We utilised the latest socioeconomic datasets to compile China's 2012 multiregional input-output (MRIO) table. Environmentally extended input-output analysis and structural decomposition analysis (SDA) were applied to investigate the driving forces behind changes in CO2 emissions embodied in China's domestic and foreign trade from 2007 to 2012. Here we show that emission flow patterns have changed greatly in both domestic and foreign trade since the financial crisis. Some economically less developed regions, such as Southwest China, have shifted from being a net emission exporter to being a net emission importer. In terms of foreign trade, emissions embodied in China's exports declined from 2007 to 2012 mainly due to changes in production structure and efficiency gains, while developing countries became the major destination of China's export emissions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available