4.6 Article

Lithium manganese phosphate-carbon composite as a highly active and durable electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 245, Issue -, Pages 211-218

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.131

Keywords

LiMnPO4; oxygen reduction; conductivity; Mn valence state; stability

Funding

  1. Institute for Basic Science in Republic of Korea [IBS-R006-G1]
  2. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea - Ministry of Education [2013R1A1A1010205, 2012R1A1A2007797]
  3. MEST
  4. POSTECH
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A1A2007797, 2013R1A1A1010205] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Development of Pt-free electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is one of the most important tasks for fuel cell commercialization. Various Mn compounds have been proposed as catalysts for ORR, but poor activity and stability necessitate further advances for their practical utilization. In this study, we demonstrate a lithium manganese phosphate-carbon composite (LMP-C) as a highly active and durable electrocatalyst for ORR in alkaline medium. LMP-C, synthesized by the solid-state method, exhibited significantly enhanced electrical conductivity and electrochemical properties, which led to a substantial increase in ORR performance. Comparison between LMP-C and the manganese phosphate-carbon composite, based on various physicochemical characterizations, revealed a high preference for the formation of the Mn3+ state on the surface of LMP-C that resulted in effective charge transfer during oxygen reduction. Moreover, the excellent stability of LMP-C was confirmed by carrying out 3000 cycles of the accelerated durability test, in which no drop in ORR performance was observed. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available