4.4 Article

Long-term evolution of viruses: A Janus-faced balance

Journal

BIOESSAYS
Volume 39, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201700026

Keywords

beneficial viruses; persistence triangle; viral domestication; viral endogenization; virus-host interactions

Funding

  1. Higher Education Commission [21-519/SRGP/RD/HEC/2014]
  2. KOPRI [PE17020]
  3. National Science Foundation [OISE-1132791]
  4. United States Department of Agriculture [ILLU-802-909, ILLU-483-625]
  5. Blue Waters allocation
  6. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering
  7. Office Of The Director [1132791] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Korea Polar Research Institute of Marine Research Placement (KOPRI) [PE17020] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The popular textbook image of viruses as noxious and selfish genetic parasites greatly underestimates the beneficial contributions of viruses to the biosphere. Given the crucial dependency of viruses to reproduce in an intracellular environment, viruses that engage in excessive killing (lysis) can drive their cellular hosts to extinction and will not survive. The lytic mode of virus propagation must, therefore, be tempered and balanced by non-lytic modes of virus latency and symbiosis. Here, we review recent bioinformatics and metagenomic studies to argue that viral endogenization and domestication may be more frequent mechanisms of virus persistence than lysis. We use a triangle diagram to explain the three major virus persistence strategies that explain the global scope of virus-cell interactions including lysis, latency and virus-cell symbiosis. This paradigm can help identify novel directions in virology research where scientists could artificially gain control over switching lytic and beneficial viral lifestyles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available