4.7 Article

Environmental vulnerability evaluation using a spatial principal components approach in the Daxing'anling region, China

Journal

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
Volume 78, Issue -, Pages 405-415

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.039

Keywords

Environmental vulnerability evaluation; Spatial principal component analysis; Geographical information system; Daxing'anling area

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Identifying environmentally vulnerable regions is an important aspect of forest resource management, especially in boreal forest ecosystems that exhibit sensitivity to climate change. In this study, an environmental vulnerability index was constructed to describe the vulnerability status of the ecosystem in the Daxing'anling region, Heilongjiang Province, China. Thirteen variables related to exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity of the ecosystem were selected and integrated into a comprehensive index using spatial principal component analysis. The vulnerability within each part of the study area was then classified into one of five levels, including potential, slight, light, medium and heavy vulnerability, based on the numerical values. Results showed that the degree of vulnerability was unevenly distributed throughout the Daxing'anling region. The highest environmental vulnerability index value was approximately 0.86 in the southern and central areas, suggesting that these regions are the most vulnerable to environmental changes. The lowest value was approximately 0.036 in the eastern region, which indicates a relatively high-quality environment that is less vulnerable to environmental changes. The results of the environmental vulnerability evaluation may be helpful for decision makers by providing a comparatively rational decision making tool for planning and implementing effective forest resource management. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available