4.7 Article

Stocks and flows of natural capital: Implications for Ecological Footprint

Journal

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
Volume 77, Issue -, Pages 123-128

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.01.033

Keywords

Stock vs. flow; Natural capital; Ecological assets; Resource accounting

Funding

  1. MAVA Foundation pour la Nature [13/67]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Over the past decade, Ecological Footprint has become one of the most popular and widespread indicators for sustainability assessment and resource management. However, its popularity has been coupled, especially in recent years, by the emergence of critical views on the indicator's rationale, methodology and policy usefulness. Most of these criticisms commonly point to the inability of the Ecological Footprint to track the human-induced depletion of natural capital stocks as one of the main shortcomings of the methodology. Fully addressing this issue will require research efforts and, most likely, further methodological refinements. The aim of this paper is therefore to outline the basis of a new area of investigation in Ecological Footprint research, primarily aimed at implementing the distinction between the use of stocks and the use of flows in Ecological Footprint Accounting and debating its implications. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available